I n c o r p o r e a l s  C h e a p  S i n c e  2 0 0 2
N A K E D Louisiana O W N E R S H I P 
All Things Legal in Louisiana




 


March 28, 2006


Court of Appeal Reverses Kaiser Judgment

Today the Louisiana Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, reversed an $88.75 million judgment in favor of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Co., its reinsurers, and one of its injured employees against electrical-products manufacturer Thomas & Betts Corp. In re: Gramercy Plant Explosion at Kaiser, 04-1151 through 04-1191 (La. App. 5 Cir. 3/28/06).

The case arose from a tremendous explosion at the Kaiser plant in Gramercy, Louisiana on July 5, 1999, which destroyed a large section of the plant’s alumina-processing section. The explosion spawned scores of lawsuits, including suits by Kaiser, its reinsurers, and two dozen injured employees against various defendants, including T&B. Kaiser alleged that the explosion was caused by a power failure preceding the explosion, and that the power failure was caused in part by the failure of a T&B product.

The numerous lawsuits were consolidated in St. James Parish, Louisiana. By the beginning of trial in the fall of 2001, most of the claims had been settled. The jury trial consumed six weeks, and by its end, the only remaining claims were those of Kaiser, its reinsurers, and one Kaiser employee against T&B and another manufacturer. The jury returned a defense verdict, finding both remaining defendants free of fault. But the trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) against T&B, assigning 25% fault to T&B, and fixing damages at $335 million for Kaiser and its reinsurers and $20 million for the injured employee, thus making T&B liable for $88.75 million in damages. Additionally, the trial court granted the plaintiffs a conditional new trial, to be held if the JNOV were reversed on appeal. The Court of Appeal’s judgment reversed both the JNOV and conditional new trial and reinstated the jury’s verdict in T&B’s favor.

It is expected that Kaiser and the other plaintiffs will either seek rehearing in the Court of Appeal or seek further appellate review by the Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Posted by RPW at March 28, 2006 05:44 PM
Naked Ownership Resources
Codes and Statutes
News Links
Parish Data

Other Resources
Capital Clerks
Judicial Interest Rate
Prescription [pdf]
Westlaw
Lexis

Naked Ownership Maps
Judicial Districts
Appeal Courts
Federal Courts
Parish

Court Rules
State District
LA Uniform Appeal
LA First Circuit
LA Second Circuit
LA Third Circuit
LA Fourth Circuit
LA Fifth Circuit
State Supreme
Federal District (La.)
US Bankruptcy (ED)
US Bankruptcy (MD)
US Bankruptcy (WD) [pdf]
US Fifth Circuit
US Supreme

State Court Sites
Supreme
First Circuit
Second Circuit
Third Circuit
Fourth Circuit
Fifth Circuit

Federal Court Sites
Eastern District
Middle District
Western District
Fifth Circuit

Bankruptcy Court Sites
Eastern District
Middle District
Western District

Louisiana Blawgers
AJ Levy
Steve Covell
Bradley Parker
Ernest Svenson
Ray Ward
Gideon's Promise
Kitty Says

BAR ASSOCIATIONS
American
State
Baton Rouge
Lafayette
New Orleans
Shreveport

LAW LIBRARIES
State
LSU
Loyola
Southern
Tulane

LAW SCHOOLS
LSU
Loyola
Southern
Tulane
Home
E-Mail
Syndicate / RSS

About
The Name
Disclaimer
Copyright

Contributors
Al J. Robert, Jr.
Ernest E. Svenson
Raymond P. Ward
Todd R. Slack
Capital Clerks
You?

Browse by Month:

Browse by Category:

AG Opinions (2)
Alexandria (36)
Attorneys (13)
Baton Rouge (198)
Blawgistan (1)
Blawgs (10)
Community (23)
Dicta (21)
District Courts (4)
Ethics (14)
Judges (18)
LA 1st Circuit (16)
LA 2nd Circuit (10)
LA 3rd Circuit (3)
LA 4th Circuit (4)
LA 5th Circuit (1)
LA Case Opinions (1)
LA Register (1)
LA Supreme Court (42)
Lafayette (49)
Lake Charles (27)
Law Enforcement (2)
Law School (1)
Legislation (34)
Making A Differnce (6)
Meta (4)
Monroe (46)
National (6)
New Orleans (213)
Politics (8)
Practice (13)
Reference (2)
Shreveport (87)
Site of the Day (8)
State (8)
Technology (3)
US 5th Circuit (36)
US District Courts (8)


Site Meter